aapl

We start the new year with the disappearance of two household names in the financial world, Merrill Lynch which sold itself to Bank of America, (NYSE: BAC) fearing the worst of the broadly deteriorating financial markets; and Wachovia that not only feared the worst but lived through it only long enough to be acquired by Wells Fargo (NYSE: WFC). Both transactions completed yesterday while the market was closed.

The market has been up all day and both BAC and WFC can be upbeat as two of the world's survivors of the 2008 minefields that blew up some of the largest and most revered names in many generations.

The BAC deal propels it to be the No. 1 financial institution in the United States with about $2.7 trillion in assets. Merrill Lynch ends a 94 year run. Earlier in the year BAC acquired Countrywide Financial. These two deals allow Bank of America to stand tall as he largest originator and servicing company for new loans, just when home refinancing may take off based on new lower rates becoming available. It may be able to expand financial services when the world is hoping for even a modest recovery.

TheStreet.com's Jim Cramer says Goldman's sturdy balance sheet has it positioned for good returns in 2009.

Remember the craze to own deposit banks? Remember the thought that if you had oodles of deposits, you could make it through this period with much more aplomb than if you were an investment bank, an investment bank like Lehman or Merrill (NYSE: MER) (Cramer's Take) or Bear? Or, of course, obviously, Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS) (Cramer's Take) and Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS) (Cramer's Take)?

The stocks are saying that the judgment -- the judgment in favor of deposits against so-called "hot money" -- may be inaccurate or at least premature.

The judgment, as meted by Goldman Sachs' stock, in fact, is saying that the deposit game may be dead wrong for 2009.

You can see what's happening with the Goldman Sachs base and the lack of erratic trading, perhaps because the goal of breaking Goldman Sachs didn't happen. It didn't happen by now, it ain't happening -- that's what the stock's screaming.

Citigroup Inc. (NYSE: C)'s CEO Vikram Pandit, chairman Win Bischoff, and board member Robert Rubin will forgo 2008 bonuses. This comes, of course, after the bank lost three-quarters of its market value and got a $45 billion U.S. bailout. Citi shares traded nearly 2% in premarket.

Time Warner Cable (NYSE: TWC) and Viacom (NYSE: VIA.b) have agreed to settle a dispute over carriage fees. This comes after Viacom threatened TWC with a blackout of its 19 ceable channels, including MTV, Nickelodeon and Comedy Central. With a deal in the works, TWC customers will suffer no blackout. TWC is expected to agree to pay a modest increase in fees to Viacom in the new deal.

Microsoft Corp. (NASDAQ: MSFT) has been the subject of much news, talk and rumors the past few days. First, on Wednesday, many of its Zune digital music player froze due to the leap year. Then, China sentenced 11 for software piracy. The allegedly sold at least $2 billion worth of bogus Microsoft software. And to top all that, the blogosphere was abuzz as rumors swirled that Microsoft was going to lay off 15,000 or 17% of its staff on January 15, 2009. With the current slowdown in the economy, it's not a stretch to accept Microsoft would initiate some jobs cuts; the question is at what magnitude. MSFT shares were flattish in recent premarket trade despite all the news.

Here's a pretty awesome deal: Work for Merrill Lynch for a few days until it's acquired by Bank of America Corporation (NYSE: BAC) and receive a $25 million golden parachute.

Then turn around and buy a $37 million Park Avenue apartment. Peter Kraus was hired to help with "overseeing the firm's business strategy and investments; global growth plans and opportunities, and corporate acquisitions. He will also lead initiatives to integrate the work of the corporate strategy and business development team with the efforts of the firm's senior business leaders around the world to identify cross-platform synergies."

But there wasn't much of a business strategy or global growth plan to oversee in his few hours on the job before he resigned to collect his money.

Normally, atrocities like this would be irrelevant, except to shareholders in the companies involved. But given that the Treasury Department has made your money available to these firms, you have every right to be outraged: If they can pay someone $25 million for a few days' work, why do they need us?

Here is a roster of some of the fallen ones.

Jimmy Cayne Former CEO Bear Stearns - latest compensation $32.1 million. He led Bear Stearns for 15 years. He resigned last January. Bear Stearns was acquired by JPMorgan Chase (NYSE: JPM) for $10.00 a share. He and his wife purchased two luxury apartments at the Plaza.

Richard Fuld Former CEO Lehman Brothers - Latest compensation $34.4 million. Subpoenaed by federal investigators to determine if he misled investors at Lehman. Executives at Barclays Capital (NYSE: BCS) bought Lehman's US assets.

Kerry Killinger Former CEO WaMu - latest compensation $4.5 million. He became CEO in 1990 and built WaMU into one of the largest US mortgage writers. He offered sub prime mortgages which led to WaMU's rapid growth. He was ousted in September when WaMU was sold to JPMorgan.

Angelo Mozilo Former CEO Countrywide - latest compensation $132 million. He helped build Countrywide into one of the country's largest lenders. A host of class action lawsuits have been filed against Countrywide, which is under investigation by the SEC. Countrywide was sold to Bank of America (NYSE: BAC) in January.

Trillions of dollars have been introduced into the world economy since last July, when I thought it would be interesting to jump in and pick stocks prior to the carnage in the financial sector taking complete hold.

For the past eight months our government has been taking over financial institutions, absorbing debt, lowering interest rates, nationalizing some private companies, investing in others, and rebating taxes through stimulus packages to increase liquidity and spending. The Federal Reserve has essentially dropped the interest to zero.

The government was the last to announce that we are in a recession. Well, duh! However, recession or not the world is still open for business although less of it. Gold is down 30% from it's highs and oil having totally collapsed from $147 a barrel at the time of the original story to the low $30's now.

The original story was Serious Money: Tempting fate with 10 financials -- buying into a pool of financial stocks at a time when these stocks went unloved by all.

Eight of the ten financial stocks I wrote about are down or out at this point. When I last reported, the portfolio was losing 47% but it has sunk to new lows now standing at a loss of 58.56%. This compares to a drop in the S&P 500 of 29% or half the loss.

There are many analysts suggesting that we finally have arrived at the time to invest in financial stocks. Perhaps that is true, but do you invest in the downtrodden or the blue chips?

At their base level, Ponzi schemes are incredibly simple: the schemer promises a consistent, impressive return on an investment, which he funds by soliciting new investors and using their money to pay off earlier investors. If the schemer can successfully project an air of reliability, he can often convince his investors to keep their principal in the fund, which means that he only has to pay dividends, improving his profit margin and extending the longevity of his scam.

Any intelligent person recognizes that a Ponzi scheme is, essentially, suicidal. Even in a consistently strong market, there will come a day when people will withdraw from the fund, investigators will shut it down, or the financial house of cards will fall apart. The best that a Ponzi schemer can hope for is that he will die before he is caught or will somehow be able to pull out all funds and make a run for it. In the case of Bernard Madoff, it's pretty clear that he was counting on the former. While this didn't work out, one could make a strong argument that Madoff's life currently isn't worth a plugged nickel: even if he somehow survives the next few months without suffering a massive coronary, chances are that a former investor or fellow inmate (or both!) will soon introduce him to the business end of a shank.

According to a Dow Jones report this morning, Citigroup (NYSE: C) has decided to cancel the Christmas party planned for its fixed-income staff in London. The soirée was supposed to be held this Thursday, December 11, but the financial firm apparently decided it was inappropriate to celebrate, considering the 52,000 job cuts it recently announced. The party's cancellation comes shortly after Citi scrapped a holiday celebration for its London equities division, which would have been held December 3.

Today's news from Citigroup is simply the most prominent report among a growing trend this year for U.S. corporations. In my own neighborhood, I can name more than a few companies who've axed their own Christmas plans in deference to the sorry state of the U.S. economy, as well as the continually growing unemployment rolls. It may be the holiday season, but it's harder than ever to find members of the working class who feel like celebrating.

If there's a silver lining to the anti-holiday mood, it's probably the growing trend toward prudent sacrifice among major corporations. Yesterday, we learned that executives at Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS) and Merrill Lynch (NYSE: MER) will forgo bonuses -- and regular pay, in some instances -- along with many of their peers at other investment banks. Is it the least these guys could do? Maybe. But, as any addict can tell you, the first step toward recovery is admitting you have a problem. Now that top executives are starting to shoulder some of the blame, Wall Street could finally be ready for rehab.

Elizabeth Harrow is an analyst and financial writer in the research department at Schaeffer's Investment Research. She is featured in the video series Schaeffer's Daily Q&A on SchaeffersResearch.com.

On Monday morning, Doug McIntyre posted that former Merrill Lynch CEO John Thain was demanding a $10 million bonus for his work there. But now CNBC is reporting that Thain won't be getting any bonus at all.

So far, details are not forthcoming but Charlie Gasparino, CNBC's On Air Edtior, reported that Thain, along with several other executives, will forgo bonuses this year. The Wall Street Journal is also reporting that according to people familiar with the matter, Thain, Merrill President Gregory Fleming and wealth management chief Robert McCann asked the board's compensation committee not to pay them for their work in 2008. So did two other Merrill executives.

Thain is being unfairly punished because the problems at Merrill happened under his predecessor Stan O'Neal. O'Neal walked away from the mountain of toxic waste he created with $161 million. He's the one who should be forking over a chunk of his compensation due to the problems he caused. To make Thain pay the price is unfair -- but politically expedient.

[Update: Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS) CEO John Mack would not get a bonus for a second straight year. The bank also announced compensation changes that should link pay and performance better.]

Peter Cohan is president of Peter S. Cohan & Associates. Portfolio will publish his book about Boeing, You Can't Order Change: Lessons from Jim McNerney's Turnaround at Boeing, on December 26, 2008. He has no financial interest in the securities mentioned.

General Motors Corp. (NYSE: GM) and Ford Motor Co. (NYSE: F) soared about 19% each in Frankfurt as Congress is getting closer to approve a bailout for the Big 3 automakers. The White House and Democratic congressional leaders are narrowing their differences and could agree on a deal and bring to a vote soon. Both shares are trading 21% and 18% higher respectively in premarket (8:12 am). By midday, both automakers' stocks were up about 14%.

Other gainers in Frankfurt include oil and gas producers, commodity stocks and financials: Alcoa Inc. (NYSE: AA) jumped 10%, Bank of America (NYSE: BAC) shares rose 11% and Exxon Mobil (NYSE: XOM) gained about 5%. In premarket, AA shares are 6.4%, 5% and 2.4% higher (8:15 am). Commodities, industrials, financial and oil & gas stocks continued to gain well throughout the session with Alcoa up 14% by midday and BAC up 11%. XOM was only up 2.5% thought.

Tribune Co. may file for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection as soon as this week, according to sources of The Wall Street Journal, as the newspaper industry worsens.

Hartford Financial (NYSE: HIG) shares are continuing their massive upward trend from Friday after the insurer raised its full-year operating profit forecast and said the capital outlook at its insurance units was strong. Shares are up 13.4% in premarket trading. HIG stock had simiilar gains by midday trading.

After shareholders had approved on Friday Bank of America's takeover of Merrill Lynch (NYSE: MER), Merrill's CEO John Thain has suggested to directors that he get a 2008 bonus of as much as $10 million. According to WSJ sources, the company's compensation committee is resisting his request.

The vacation that greed took to make way for austerity on Wall Street compensation ended prematurely. Merrill Lynch (NYSE: MER) CEO John Thain wants a $10 million bonus and he wants it now.

Merrill's board is likely to give Thain nothing. According to The Wall Street Journal, "The difference of opinion between Mr. Thain and directors who hired him just a year ago is part of the bigger debate about compensation practices at Wall Street firms."

To characterize Thain's request as a simple matter of excessive pay making a return to Wall Street would be an oversimplification. The Merrill CEO has been on the job for a year. He was brought into a situation which was nearly untenable. The company was faced with mounting losses because of decisions made by earlier management. He may have saved the firm by selling it to Bank of America (NYSE: BAC). It is hard to compare that with other financial chiefs who have done little or nothing for their firms beyond letting their share prices fall and forcing government bailouts.

Harvard's business school (HBS) has been celebrating its 100th anniversary this year. And it looks to be at the peak of its power. That's unfortunate because five of its most powerful graduates have made significant contributions to absolutely wrecking the global economy. HBS admits people who are natural leaders. Unfortunately, many of the most powerful of these leaders have followed the path of destruction.

Here are five Harvard MBAs who wrecked the economy:

• George W. Bush ('75). The best thing I can say about Bush is that he said he was sorry for all the problems that occurred while he was in the White House. Unfortunately, he seems to believe he was a victim of events outside his control. One of his HBS professors said of Bush "He showed pathological lying habits and was in denial when challenged on his prejudices and biases. He would even deny saying something he just said 30 seconds ago."
• Hank Paulson ('70). As Treasury Secretary Paulson has consistently ignored the severity of the financial crisis -- In June 2006 he gave a speech at HBS in which he said, "this is by far the best global economy that I have seen in my career" -- but this September he was able to sell Congress on an ineffective plan to fix what he finally realized was an imploding economy -- a plan has kept changing. The economy has continued to crash despite his bone-headed efforts to save it.

Merrill Lynch & Co. (NYSE: MER) is planning to cut year-end bonuses in half in a show of fiscal discipline.

Why stop there?

Shares of the New York-based company are down more than 78% this year. Keep in mind that Bank of America Corp. (NYSE: BAC) agreed to buy the once-venerable firm for $50 billion, a deal which is still making its way through the regulatory process. Did I mention that Merrill and Bank of America got a combined $25 billion from the Treasury Department and that Merrill may lose $13.3 billion this year, based on the average estimate of nine analysts surveyed by Bloomberg? That's more than double from a year earlier.

What in that sorry performance merits a reward of any sort? Wall Street needs to ween itself from the notion that everyone deserves a bonus, regardless of the macroeconomic environment. Top executives at Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (NYSE: GS) and UBS AG (NYSE: UBS) are refusing bonuses. Heck, so are the heads of the tone-deaf auto industry.

Merrill has already been very generous with its employees. Chief Executive John Thain got a $15 million sign-on bonus when he joined the company with the expectations that he would fix the mess created by Stan O'Neal. Given the turn of events, maybe he should give some of that money back. In 2007, the company paid out $15.9 billion, about $248,000 per employee.

Most analysts believed that Bank of America (NYSE: BAC) would cut about 10,000 jobs in its consolidation of operations with Merrill Lynch (NYSE: MER) which it bought earlier in the year. That would be enough people to hit the promised cost saving for putting the two firms together. It is a lot of people out of work, but not a blood bath.

Well, it looks like the blood bath has come and no one appears to have expected it. According to CNBC, "Bank of America could end up cutting 30,000 jobs as it moves to absorb Merrill Lynch, three times as many as previously estimated."

Did Bank of America mislead its employees, the press, and investors? Perhaps, but it may have done so for all of the right reasons. Predictions now are the B of A will lose a lot more money than most observers expected a month ago. It faces huge write-offs in its real estate and consumer credit portfolios. That may mean the firm could be faced with having to raise more money and dilute current shareholders. It could also hurt the bank's chances of maintaining its dividend and current share price level which is already down from a 52-week high of $47 to just above $14.

The new layoffs are not good for the poor people who will be hitting the exits, but the news may add weight to the impression that bank earnings for the current quarter are falling apart fast.

Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com.

General Motors Corp. (NYSE: GM) -- as it runs short of cash and attempts to raise $4 billion from asset sales, GM has asked real estate agent Jones Lang LaSalle for help in raising up to $257 million from the sale and leaseback of some of its European offices and other property assets, as well as inquired about its options regarding the Renaissance Center, the Detroit skyscraper complex that serves as its headquarters, the Financial Times reported.

Meanwhile, adding insult to injury, GM has asked the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration to prevent public tracking of a jet it leases.

Ford Motor Co. (NYSE: F) is also ignoring public outcry and is so far resisting pressure to cut the salary of its chief executive. Maybe asking emergency help from the federal government requires that large compensation...

Staying with automarkers, Deutsche Bank analyst Rod Lache said the scales are tipping in favor of a federal bailout from GM and Ford, MarketWatch said. GM traded 12% higher and Ford shares were 15% higher in the first minutes of trade.

Bank of America (NYSE: BAC) -- The Federal Reserve Board officially approved BAC.'s acquisition of Merril Lynch (NYSE: MER) on Wednesday in a $50 billion deal first announced in September. BAC shares were nearly 3% higher and MER's over 4% higher in the first few minutes of trade.