FeedPosted Nov 23rd 2009 1:20PM by Brent Archer (RSS feed)
Filed under: Major movement, Bad news, Newspapers, Magazines, Options, Technical Analysis

Valeant Pharmaceuticals (
VRX -
option chain) stock is trading lower today after
an article in Barron's (subscription required) over the weekend said the company could see trouble ahead if its experimental epilepsy drug, which is undergoing the regulatory review process, is not profitable enough to offset declining royalties from its hepatitis C treatment. If you think this stock won't be rising too far in the coming months, then it could be a good time to look at a bearish hedged play on VRX.
This morning, VRX opened at $32.15. So far today the stock has hit a high of $32.95 and a low of $31.88. As of 11:30, VRX is trading at $32.07, down $1.21 (-3.6%). The chart for VRX looks bullish.
Continue reading Valeant Pharma (VRX) falls on bearish Barron's coverage
Posted Aug 5th 2009 1:30PM by Steven Mallas (RSS feed)
Filed under: Earnings reports, Magazines
Playboy Enterprises (NYSE: PLA) is still around? I was surprised to hear that it was, according to a news article from Reuters detailing the struggling media company's second-quarter results. Unfortunately, Playboy remains a puzzle. How in the world is management going to turn the ship around?
Playboy's top line fell by 15%. The bottom line booked a loss of 26 cents per share. Expectations were for 23 cents per share to be lost. In the year-ago period, Playboy lost 10 cents per share. I think it's plainly obvious that Playboy just isn't the force it once was. Pretty sad to see this icon slowly fade into irrelevance as the digital revolution continues to devalue its historic brand equity.
Continue reading Playboy's second quarter: Not centerfold material
Posted Jul 14th 2009 5:15PM by Zac Bissonnette (RSS feed)
Filed under: Magazines

A subscription to BusinessWeek will cost you $46 for $46 issues --
an 80% savings off the newsstand price!Or you could just buy the company and have done with it.
McGraw-Hill (NYSE:
MHP) is exploring a sale of the beleaguered icon, but the magazine's huge operating losses could mean it will fetch just $1, according to some experts.
The reason? With annual losses estimated at anywhere from $10 million to $75 million, acquiring the business would cost huge sums of money for at least a few years -- even if a miraculous turnaround can be engineered. Time Inc., Forbes and Conde Nast are reportedly not seen as suitors.
Continue reading BusinessWeek could be yours for $1
Posted May 22nd 2009 2:30PM by Zac Bissonnette (RSS feed)
Filed under: Magazines, Competitive strategy
With persistent rumors about top newspapers shifting toward nonprofit models, the "beg your readers for cash" plan is working for at least one smaller outlet.
A week ago, Paste, a music magazine, began asking its readers for donations. The Associated Press reports that "Editor-in-chief Josh Jackson said Thursday the suburban Atlanta-based monthly has raised $166,000 in donations. The magazine focusing on music, film and culture is struggling after a sharp decline in advertising revenue."
In an interview with Media Life, Jackson explained that the magazine has been able to drum up support by offering exclusive bonus tracks donated by artists like the Indigo Girls, Robyn Hitchcock, and The Decemberists.
Continue reading Music magazine raises cash with donations
Posted May 21st 2009 2:30PM by Zac Bissonnette (RSS feed)
Filed under: Products and services, Magazines
Donald Trump's magazine, the cleverly-titled Trump, has folded after two anonymous years of poor sales. Did anyone reading this know that there was a Trump magazine?
Apparently this was the Donald's third run at having a magazine and each time it's been a cash-burning machine, perhaps because people who are intelligent enough to be literate don't buy into his tower of hot air. Gawker reports that "Trump Magazine was launched in late 2007 as a joint venture by the Trump brand and Ocean Drive Media Group (now Niche Media Holdings LLC), targeting affluent readers in major U.S. markets. The quarterly magazine saw early success, cashing in on the booming advertising market for yachts and other high-end commodities."
Continue reading Donald Trump's magazine closes
Posted May 12th 2009 3:30PM by Zac Bissonnette (RSS feed)
Filed under: Magazines
Playboy Enterprises (NYSE:
PLA) reported another bad quarter yesterday, as
Steven Mallas reported. It's no secret that Playboy is struggling because of changing demographics and the economy, but the post-earnings release conference call included another bombshell: The monthly magazine that was founded in 1953 may not be monthly for much longer.
The Wall Street Journal reports (subscription required) that "Playboy magazine, which has a guaranteed circulation of 2.6 million, this summer will combine its July and August issues to save money on printing and distribution, a move it says could be a precursor to a permanent curtailing of frequency."
Continue reading Playboy going bi-monthly or quarterly?
Posted Apr 28th 2009 9:30AM by Zac Bissonnette (RSS feed)
Filed under: Magazines

It's a sad day for business journalism. Conde Nast announced that it is shuttering
Portfolio, the glossy monthly business magazine launched two years ago and the accompanying web site, effective immediately.
What's so sad about this is that the magazine's failure appears to be a direct result of the soft economy and weak ad spending. For my money,
Portfolio was the best business magazine going -- infinitely better than
Fortune and
Forbes.
Continue reading Condé Nast closes Portfolio
Posted Apr 24th 2009 4:20PM by Sarah Gilbert (RSS feed)
Filed under: Bad news, Magazines, Marketing and advertising

Ad pages have been falling throughout the magazine publishing industry, and titles have been shut down at a breakneck pace this year, with newspapers not far behind. Some titles seem immune to the problem; or, at the very least, the lesser of many evilly-immense decreases.
Scientific American, as a unit of book publishing juggernaut Macmillan, was one of those at only an 18.1% ad page decline in 2009's first quarter. And the title, 164 years old, has weathered many storms in the industry; it's as solid as an oak.
Yesterday, news of a reorganization had industry onlookers worried that a few employees would be let go. By the end of the day, media watchers were shocked as Editor-in-Chief John Rennie, who's held that role for 15 years, and
at least 20 other employees were laid off.
Continue reading Layoffs at 'Scientific American' show depth of ad meltdown
Next Page »