There have been rumors circulating around the blogosphere, which have reached the Street that Apple Inc. (NASDAQ: AAPL) might have to delay the release of the iPhone from June to October and the Leopard operating system, already delayed to October, delayed again until January. Apple's PR department has reiterated to the mongers that all is still on schedule.
Okay, great, but then this begs the question, "What if?'" What if Apple did have to delay the launch of these products, especially the iPhone? The reasons would have to be known as they would ascertain the ultimate and proper release date. Is it component sourcing that is an issue? Is it a software-quality issue? Did the beta-testing units developed a few glitches? The reasons would be put into one of two camps: Can Apple control the issue, or is the issue out of Apple's control?
If the iPhone is delayed, what happens to the stock short-term and to the earnings model? The stock would take a hit to be sure, as it did today when the rumors reached traders, before the retraction. Usually this is a situation of shoot first, ask questions later and indeed AAPL plunged to $103.42 (down 2.7%) today on the news.
Update: The iPhone release date of June 29 has been confirmed as of June 3, 2007.
The earnings for Apple are not reliant on the iPhone's release for calendar 2007. I think estimates have not considered the potential $0.70-0.75 the iPhone could add this year with a June release. Analysts in general feel that the iPhone could contribute about a dollar for 2008 at the minimum. But as of yet, no one has been willing to be precise on the earnings potential for 2008.
One thing is for sure. If there were a delay in the iPhone's release date, the "expectations" of earnings beats and earnings raises would certainly get pushed out a quarter or two, so the urgency to be involved with the stock would lessen. Without the urgency factor and the "do I have a full position in Apple?" factor, the stock could lose a bit of its momentum and could be stuck in a trading range until definitive details and schedules are known. This is why Apple would have to be crystal clear in its communications if there were a delay.
The game of "what if" can be nerve-wracking as portfolio managers try to be timely in their purchases. The one thing I can firmly say is that Apple is a winning investment over the next 3-5 years as it has been the past three years. The whole beautiful product cycle is still early.
Georges Yared is the CIO of Yared Investment Research where he explores more growth stock ideas.











Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
5-16-2007 @ 3:11PM
ThunkDifferent.com said...
Rumors, rumors...
i sure hope this isn't true. i just remarked on the 109.36 closing the other day, but in regards to products Ubuntu & Linux have been making some ground and due to compatibility many consumers wouldn't be able to wait for Apple to come around. iPhone could wait due to FCC regulation,( the website still says it is not officially up to code) but Leopard, why hand it out at WWDC in June; then delay OS 10.5 past October - this is not a rumor i will be looking our for.
http://ThunkDifferent.com
5-16-2007 @ 4:41PM
BILL said...
THANKS FOR DEPRESSING THE APPLE STOCK. ASSUME YOU DID NOT CHECK THE FACTS AND IF SO, SHAME ON YOU.
I READ YOUR STUFF AND NOW WILL BE MUCH MORE LEARY OF THE CONTENTS IN THE FUTURE.
5-16-2007 @ 7:08PM
Greg said...
Georges, are you trying to feed the bears? Your post is a classic ready-fire-aim piece. If you read the news, the rumor you comment on is a FAKE. Apple has gone on the record to reiterate the release period for the iPhone and OS-X 10.5. What the individual(s) who posted the false rumor did was malicious. But you did none of us any good with your reaction.
Facts are facts. And while I agree that Apple's stock has been pushed to nosebleed levels at the moment, spreading false rumors does no one any good.
I hope you learn from your embarrassing mistake. When you assume, you make an ass of yourself.
5-17-2007 @ 12:11AM
J said...
Georges:
I know this is a "what if" piece. Fine, speculate away about what would happen IF the iPhone were delayed. But -- and this is important -- don't call what happened today simply a "rumor" that is "circulating" when the source of this lie (engadget) quickly retracted its claim and said that Apple PR called to say the document referenced was a "FAKE".
In other words, this was a confirmed LIE and a malicious sabotage. Not a rumor that is circulating.
Your lack of clarity is atrocious.